Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Mohawks Block Police Station

Tyendinaga Mohawks Block Police Station; Arrests Expected

Tyendinaga Mohawks, April 2008

Tyendinaga Mohawks block police station again, face charges

Several protesters face charges

Posted By BELLEVILLE INTELLIGENCER STAFF [Ontario]
Friday, October 31, 2008

Tyendinaga Mohawk police said they expect to lay criminal charges against several protesters following antics this week at the site of the new police station on the territory.

An investigation headed by members of the Tyendinaga First Nations Police Service is underway into the actions of more than 20 native protesters on the York Road property this week.

The presence of the protesters thwarted plans to have the prefabricated police headquarters building delivered and set up at the site Wednesday.

Police Chief Ron Maracle said his officers “are still gathering evidence and going through video footage” taken by officers.

“There are going to be a number of charges with relation to this incident … and we will probably be laying charges against several individuals.”

In a press scrum near the site, native protest leader Shawn Brant — who was on strict court-imposed conditions not to participate in an illegal protest — claimed the actions of the group were meant to show band members were unhappy with the band council’s decision to support the new police headquarters building.

Police chief Maracle, meanwhile wouldn’t confirm whether Brant was one of the people who would be charged in connection to the event.

“At this point, we haven’t identified exactly who we are going to charge,” he said. Brant, however, was seen among the protesters at the site Wednesday and walked from the protest to nearby reporters before giving his version of events of the day.



STATEMENT FROM TYENDINAGA MOHAWK TERRITORY:


WARRANTS ISSUED: 30 MOHAWKS FACING ARREST
Tyendinaga Police 'Respond' to Community Concerns


(Wednesday, November 5, 2008) It appears that Tyendinaga Police Chief Ron Maracle is making good on his promise of charging people involved in demonstrations at the intended site for a second police station, as well as a contested second quarry operation on the Territory (different location than the original and on-going reclamation of the Thurlow Aggregate quarry site).

It is believed that Tyendinaga Mohawk Police have issued warrants for 30 community members.

The people targeted for arrest are Longhouse people who maintain scrutiny over Band Council operations and spending. This amounts to an unprecedented attempt to criminalize and jail any effective opposition that exists in the community. This is an attack on our families, our children, our culture and the way we think. This has moved beyond a simple community dispute. The federal government is making a final push to eradicate those people who believe in the strength and power of the Mohawk Nation and who will stand in its defence.

Despite community concern over widespread exposure to water that has been declared unfit for human consumption throughout reserve homes and schools, the Government continues to prioritize the second station over these needs.

Concern over the second quarry operation stems from alarm at the tremendous speed with which this particular quarry has been established and grown in size. Community members are aware of the extremely rigorous environmental study and assessment practices that are required before quarries and aggregates can be established elsewhere in the province. Such laws do not apply on reserves and concern as to whether environmental and safety assessments have been properly conducted and meet recognized professional standards.

These fears have increased in recent weeks as households in the direct vicinity of quarry operations have experienced water problems and collapsed wells for the first time ever.

The quarry is operated by Build-All Contractors, a company owned by Police Chief Maracle's brother. The site preparation and overseeing of the building construction at the site of the new police station was also awarded to Build-All, the Police Chief's brother, in an untendered contract.

All of this is taking place because we oppose a decision made by the Band Council.

With army helicopters and fighter jets circulating the Territory today, the Federal Government of Canada is making it clear that it intends to exercise what it views as its interest in community affairs.

- Tyendinaga Mohawk Territory
Wednesday, November 5th, 2008


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BACKGROUND INFORMATION:

New First Nations police station draws protest
By Brian St. Denis

http://www.thepioneer.com/?q=node/2983

Friday, October 31st, 2008

A protest against the installation of a new Tyendinaga police building ended early Wednesday night when activists delayed its delivery for a second time.

Native protesters braved the frigid weather for several days to protest the installation of the York Road station on the Tyendinaga Mohawk Territory, west of Deseronto.

The building, which was assembled off-site, was trucked in Oct. 29 but was not successfully installed on the site.

"The trucking company had to leave because their permits were only good for the daylight hours, so it when it started getting dark they had to get out of there," said Brant Bardy, a spokesperson for the Tyendinaga Mohawk Territory band office.

The original delivery date was Sept. 23, making this the second delay in just over a month. Bardy said the protest has not deterred plans to bring the building in.

"The building is bought and paid for, and every delay is pushing up costs," said Bardy. "That's an injustice to the community coffers."

The issue of the heart of the protest was clean drinking water. According to the protesters, approximately 80 per cent of the community's wells are contaminated. The Quinte Mohawk School, just seconds down the road, has to provide bottled water for students because the tap water is unsafe.

"They need to address the issues," said Dan Doreen, spokesperson for the protesters. "They have bags over the fountains at the school."

He said that they don't object to the new building, but to the community having to match the government funding of $980,000. They believe this money should go to solving the drinking water problem first.

"Kids are number one," said another protester.

York Road was blocked off by the Mohawk Fire Department and several police officers for the duration of the protest. The protesters had a pick-up truck parked on the cement pad where the new building was to be placed.

The protesters also used a small tractor to dig on the property, claiming it was for a new youth centre, but Bardy said it was just a red herring.

Police announced early Wednesday morning that the protest had become a matter of public safety and blocked the public, including media, out of the area.

Bardy said that a police investigation is underway, but Tyendinaga Police Chief Ron Maracle could not be reached for comment.

Natives in Brazil's Amazon Destroy Dam Construction Site

Dam construction site in Brazil's Amazon destroyed by Indigenous peoples

October 13, 2008, IntercontinentalCry.org

In an attempt to protect the Juruena river in western Brazil, an estimated 120 members of the Enawene Nawe tribe occupied the construction site of a hydroelectric dam on October 13, and then burned it to the ground.

“They came armed with axes and pieces of wood, banished the employees and later set fire to everything” said Frederico Muller, a coordinator working at the site. At least 12 trucks were destroyed, along with a number of offices and housing units. All told, Muller suggests that there was at least a million dollars in damages.

Reporting on the action, Survival International says that right now, there are 77 dams slated for construction along the river. “The Enawene Nawe say [these dams] will pollute the water and stop the fish [from] reaching their spawning grounds.”

The Enawene Nawe see this is a major threat because the relatively isolated tribe depends on fish for survival. They are one a few tribes in the world that do not hunt or eat red meat. Fish also plays a crucial role in their customs and traditions… They say that if the fish get sick and die, then so will they.

Before the Enawene took action, they had been taking part in a “consultation process” (information exchange) with authorities, where they learned the full extent of the development. It exceeded far beyond what they had been told up to now, prompting the Enawene to immediately walk away.

Given the Enawene’s loud response, some form of reprisal can unfortunately be expected.

If you would like to support the Enawene Nawe, you can send a letter online that urges the demarcation of their land. For more news and background, visit Survival International’s page on the Enawene Nawe. Photo © www.24horasnews.com.br (More photos available here)

Colonization & Decolonization

by Zig-Zag

2007

"Liberation is the task imposed upon us by our conquest and colonization.”
(Chinweizu, The West and the Rest of Us, p. 33)

INTRODUCTION

Colonialism: the practise of invading other lands & territories, for the purpose of settlement and/or resource exploitation.

When an invading force confronts an Indigenous population already occupying a territory, colonialism becomes a violent conflict between two hostile and opposing ways of life, with one attempting to impose its will on the other.

This is a standard definition of war, and colonization itself can be considered a war for territory involving all the means used to carry out wars: military, political, economic, psychological, diplomatic, cultural, etc.

Cecil Rhodes, a British colonial official for which Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) was named, articulated the motives and goals of European colonialism in the 19th century:

“We must find new lands from which we can easily obtain raw materials and at the same time exploit the cheap slave labour that is available from the natives of the colonies. The colonies would also provide a dumping ground for the surplus goods produced in our factories.”

Due to its history and culture, European colonialism is characterized by genocidal practices, including wars of extermination, massacres of non-combatants, biological warfare, and scorched earth policies (destroying food & shelter). Other atrocities include the torture of prisoners, rape, and enslavement of Indigenous populations. These acts are fueled by racist & patriarchal ideology (i.e., Christianity & white supremacy), greed, and a psychopathic desire to kill and inflict violence and suffering on others.

Psychopath n. A person with an antisocial personality disorder, manifested in aggressive, perverted, criminal, or amoral behavior without empathy or remorse.

(The American Heritage Dictionary, p, 1415)

Stages of Colonialism

The methods & history of colonization are unique in every case, due to many different variables (geography, population density, resources, etc.). Despite this, there are common patterns that can be easily recognized. In the Americas, Africa, and Asia, colonization generally consisted of 4 stages: recon, invasion, occupation, and assimilation.

1. Recon
Colonialism begins first with small recon forces that map out new lands or regions and gather intelligence. These are often celebrated today as voyages of “exploration” & “scientific discovery.” The 1492 voyage of Columbus, for example, was a recon expedition to find a new route to Asian markets. There were only 3 ships: the Pinta, Nina, and the Santa Maria.

2. Invasion
The second phase is invasion, which begins a period of armed conflict as Indigenous nations resist colonial forces. For example, when Columbus returned to the Caribbean in 1494, he had 17 ships and over 1,000 conquistadors. Invasion can begin immediately after the recon, or may be delayed by a period of trade & settlement that serve as a basis for later invasion (i.e., N. America). In every case, colonial military strategy is genocidal and includes the destruction of food supplies, resources, & shelter, as well as massacres & biological warfare (disease).

3. Occupation
When Indigenous peoples are militarily defeated, the occupation is expanded. A colonial government is set up to control the surviving population of Natives, who are contained in reservations, or enslaved. By the 1700s, many colonial authorities were corporations (i.e., the Hudson’s Bay Company, French Senegal Company, etc.). They organized settlement & resource extraction, including the construction of railroads, dams, roads, ports, etc.

4. Assimilation
An important part of imposing control is the indoctrination of surviving Natives into the European system. In order to do this, Indigenous society & culture must be dismantled & erased as far as possible. Colonial violence, including physical destruction and biological warfare, achieve this through depopulation, often during the period of invasion. Once occupation is entrenched, this process becomes institutionalized, with generations of Indigenous youth being removed from their people & forced into government or Church-run schools.

The period of occupation and assimilation are connected, as only through occupation can systems of assimilation be imposed. This phase can be long and drawn out over centuries, as has occurred in the Americas.

1. HISTORY OF COLONIALISM

Colonialism is neither new nor limited to any specific historical period (i.e., the ‘colonial period’ of the 15th to 19th centuries). Ancient civilizations were the first to begin colonizing other lands & people. When their populations became too large, and as resources became depleted, colonists were sent out to occupy and settle new lands. When these lands were already occupied, military campaigns were carried out to gain control.
When nations & territories were conquered, the survivors were enslaved and forced to provide resources, including human labour, food, metals, wood, spices, etc. The invaders then imposed their own forms of governance, laws, religion, and education. Over time, these populations became assimilated into the culture & society of their oppressors.

Early Egyptian Colonialism

In ancient Egypt (around 1,500 BC, or 3,500 years ago), all the methods of colonialism were already being practiced. An African scholar, Cheikh Anta Diop, described these methods:

“In some towns, as in Jaffa, the conquered princes were purely & simply replaced by Egyptian generals… Egyptian garrisons were stationed at strategic points, important towns and ports… 1,400 years before Rome, Egypt created the first centralized empire in the world.

“The children of vassal [conquered] princes were taken as ‘hostages’ & educated in Egyptian style, at the court of the Egyptian emperor, in order to teach them Egyptian manners and tastes and to assimilate them to Pharoanic culture and civilization…

“The Pharoah [emperor] could at any moment require money, chariots, horses, compulsory war service; the vassal was constantly under the orders of the Egyptian generals… The vassals enjoyed only internal autonomy; in fact they had lost their international sovereignty; they could not directly deal with foreign lands”
(Cheikh Anta Diop, Civilization or Barbarism, p. 85-86).

European Colonization

When looking at the world today, we can see that this process still continues, sometimes referred to as imperialism, globalization, or even ‘peacekeeping’ and ‘humanitarian’ missions. Whatever term is used, the principles of invasion, occupation and exploitation remain the same.

Today, the European states & their settler nations dominate the global system. How did this come to be? Why is it that Western Civilization is now the primary economic, political and military power in the world? The answer to these questions can be found in the history of civilization.

Early civilizations concentrated vast amounts of human and material resources under the control of a central authority. This authority was usually in the form of kings and priests, who based their right to rule on spiritual or religious tradition. They controlled all governance, economic trade, law & order, education, etc. Through religion, mind control was imposed over citizens, which created a culture of obedience, slavery, and war (just as we see today).

The first civilizations were established in northern Africa and Mesopotamia (the Middle-East), comprised of the Egyptians, Sumerians, and Babylonians. Other civilizations also began in India, Asia, and the Americas, but those in Egypt and the Mid-East had a direct influence on Europe.

The Greeks were the main transmitters of civilized culture into Europe, based on both Egyptian and Mid-East models. The Greeks, southernmost in all of Europe, were strategically located to serve just such a role. Prior to this, southern Europe was inhabited by tribal peoples. While Egyptians built massive pyramids and cities, had a written language, advanced science and astronomy, etc., Europeans were still hunting & gathering.

This history tells us that colonization results from a society’s culture, not its racial or biological background. This culture, based on expansion, control, and exploitation, arises from civilization. Despite this, it is the European system that now dominates the world, the result of history, geography, and the exchange of culture & technology that occurred throughout the Mediterranean.

Roman Colonization

The first people colonized by Western Civilization were the European tribal peoples, such as the Goths (Germany), the Gauls (France & Spain), etc. They were invaded & occupied by the Roman Empire, beginning around 200 BC (some 2,300 years ago):

“Conquered territories were divided into provinces ruled by governors appointed in Rome for one-year terms. Governors ruled by army-enforced decree… Conquered peoples all had to pay extraordinary taxes to Rome.”
(Jack C. Estrin, World History Made Simple, p. 65)

Early accounts by Romans described these peoples as worshipping Mother Earth, organized in clans and tribes, living as semi-nomadic hunters and gatherers. They were also strong and adept military forces that inflicted numerous defeats against Roman forces, with some regions never being pacified or conquered (i.e., the Scottish Picts).

Despite this resistance, some areas such as present-day Spain, Portugal, and France, as well as parts of Germany and Britain, were occupied by Roman forces for as long as 400 years. Forced to work as slaves, to build houses and fortifications, to serve as expendable frontline soldiers, to provide resources and manufactured goods, or as servants (cooks, janitors, barbers, tutors), these conquered peoples were also increasingly assimilated into Imperial Rome.

Tribal chiefs and high-ranking families were targeted for systematic assimilation; often, their children were taken and taught how to speak and read Latin (the language of Rome). Roman clothing and overall culture were imposed. After several generations, these peoples were effectively Romanized or Latinized, with some gaining citizenship and high ranking positions in the Roman military or political system. These families, along with the Roman governing system and the Christian church, served as the basis for the feudal system which evolved in Western Europe after the collapse of the Roman empire (5th century BC).

Perhaps more than any other region, Europe stands as a stark example of the effects of colonization & assimilation. Today, very little remains of the European tribal cultures, which were destroyed & assimilated into the Roman imperial system (which explains why European civilization is essentially fascist in nature).

1492: Invasion of the Americas

In 1492, the European colonization of the Americas began with the voyage of Christopher Columbus, in command of the Nina, Pinta and the Santa Maria. This recon expedition arrived in the Caribbean and landed on the island of present-day Haiti and the Dominican Republic, which was named Hispaniola. In 1494, Columbus returned with a second, larger force, comprised of 17 ships and 1,200 soldiers, sailors, and colonists.

By 1496, it is estimated that half of the 8 million Indigenous peoples on Hispaniola were dead, killed by a combination of European diseases & massacres. Both priests & conquistadors have left detailed accounts of their atrocities, killing for fun, hunting Indigenous peoples as if they were animals, and devising all kinds of cruel and inhuman methods of torture.

Survivors were enslaved and forced to supply gold, silver and food to the conquistadors. Those who failed to meet their quotas had their hands, ears or nose cut off. From this strategic location, military campaigns were conducted into nearby islands; by 1510, the Spanish were relocating Indigenous peoples from the Bahamas and Cuba to replace the dying slaves on Hispaniola.

By 1535, Spanish conquistadors had launched military operations into Mexico, Central America, and Peru. Using guns, armour, and metal edged weapons, as well as horses, siege catapults, war dogs, and biological warfare, the Spanish left a trail of destruction, massacres, torture and rape. Tens of millions of Indigenous people were killed within the first century. The Mexica (or Aztec) alone were reduced from some 25 million people to just 3 million. Everywhere the death rate was between 90-95 % of the population.

The European invasion of the Americas was, without question, the most devastating genocide and holocaust in history. Despite this, it is still celebrated today as a ‘discovery’. With some exceptions, the history of this holocaust has been minimized or concealed.

The main goal of the Spanish and Portuguese was to take control of the land and enslave the surviving Indigenous people. Settlement was not a main objective. They established huge plantations to grow crops for export to Europe, while vast ranches were set up for cattle raising. Mines were opened to dig for gold and silver. Millions of Indigenous people were enslaved and died working in these mines.

In order to maintain a source of slaves, European traders turned to West Africa. There, Indigenous Africans, engaged in intertribal war, traded prisoners of war with the Europeans, clearly ignorant or indifferent to the long term effects such actions would have. As many as 15-20 million Africans were shipped onboard slave ships, with an estimated 40 million dying from disease & starvation on the trans-Atlantic crossing.

Despite this high level of violence & destruction, Spanish & Portuguese colonial forces were largely restricted to the coastlines of Central & South America. Many interior regions resisted for 2-3 centuries and were never conquered by the Spaniards. The Maya in the Yucatan Peninsula, for example, withdrew into the forest lowlands, where Spanish forces fell victim to disease and the intense heat. The Maya then launched military attacks and were able to resist total Spanish control.

By 1800, the Spanish laid claim to a vast region encompassing parts of South, Central, and North America. Despite this, it was an empire in decline, faced with ongoing Indigenous resistance, slave rebellions, and even settler revolts. By the mid-1800s, settler independence movements forced the Spanish out of the Americas (with the exception of Cuba & Puerto Rico).

At the time of the invasion of the Americas, Europe was in the Dark Ages, suffering from resource depletion, overpopulation, widespread poverty & social decline. Colonialism brought new resources & wealth into Europe, while destroying Indigenous nations in both the Americas and Africa. It is from the colonization of the Americas that the European nations were able to further expand and dominate the world.

1498: Invasion of North America

In 1498, John Cabot, sailing under command of the English King, claimed the east coast of present-day Newfoundland. He was followed by the French shortly after. Throughout the 1500s, the British & French attempted several colonies on the east coast of the US, but none survived the harsh winters (or, in the south, attacks by the Spanish). Finally, in 1607, a British colony was established at Jamestown, Virginia. It survived due to the help of Indigenous peoples (the tradition of Thanksgiving, adapted from Indigenous peoples, arises from this).

These early British settlers took great care to not engage in any offensive actions, especially as Indigenous peoples were militarily stronger. At first, peace & friendship treaties were made. As colonist’s numbers grew, they began to seek greater land and resources, especially the agricultural lands of Indigenous peoples. By the 1620s there was all-out war in the north-east, with colonists carrying out massacres and scorched earth policies. Combined with the effects of biological warfare (smallpox), these attacks gradually broke the ability of Indigenous nations to militarily resist.

Unlike the Spanish & Portuguese in the south, the British & French found little gold or silver with which to finance large-scale invasion. Instead, they relied on trade with Indigenous nations (i.e., the fur trade) as well as the gradual development of agriculture for export to Europe. For this reason, a dual policy of maintaining friendly relations with some, while waging war on others to gain territory, was used. Over time, however, even those that actively collaborated with the settlers were attacked, their lands taken, and their populations enslaved.

A main focus for the French & British was the transfer of large numbers of citizens to the colonies in order to relieve the pressure of over-population, as well as to garrison them against other European powers. Settlement was therefore a major factor in the colonization of N. America.

As in South & Central America, Indigenous populations suffered death rates of 90-95 % across North America. Although diseases had a major impact, they were most often accompanied by wars of extermination that targeted not only men, but also women & children. Those not killed by disease or massacre suffered starvation, as villages and crops were systematically burned by heavily armed European militias. Extermination of Indigenous people was an official policy of colonialism, limited only by the potential to make money through slavery.

Competition between the French & British led to a series of wars, fought both in Europe and in the American colonies. By 1763, France was defeated and surrendered its colonies to the British (including present-day Quebec). In turn, the British reorganized their colonial system and imposed new taxation on the colonies themselves, to help pay for the costs of war.

Along with this, the British issued the 1763 Royal Proclamation. This law limited the expansion of colonies by imposing a western boundary line (along the Appalachian Mountains). Only British Crown forces could trade, acquire land, and conduct other business in the ‘Indian Territories’. This act, which also recognized Indigenous sovereignty to land, served to limit some Indigenous resistance. At the time, the British were faced with an insurgency led by Pontiac, with an alliance of Ottawas, Algonquins, Wyandots, and others. They had captured 9 of 12 British forts and laid siege to Detroit for 6 months.

New taxes & the 1763 Royal Proclamation angered many settlers in the 13 original colonies, especially their exclusion from gaining more land. Real estate had become a huge business, with settlers taking land by violent conquest and selling it or growing cash crops such as tobacco. In response, they organized an armed revolt against the British in order to establish an independent Euro-American empire.


....continue

Insurgent Mexico

“Mexico presents special concerns. It is vital to Mexican & US security that existing & incipient insurgent movements be examined, understood & resolved. This is an undertaking as complex & challenging as any in Latin America, which forms a backdrop to what may be happening in Mexico.”

Dr. Graham H. Turbiville, “Mexico’s Other Insurgents,” Military Review, June-July 1997

Through a combination of electoral fraud, corruption, mass poverty & oppression, Mexico always appears on the verge of a political crisis. Following the July 2, 2006, elections, the Mexican government’s enduring ‘crisis of legitimacy’ only increased as uncertainty over who won, along with widespread accusations of fraud, further polarized the country. This drama dragged on through a long, hot summer, stoked by the open revolt in Oaxaca against government authority. In the end, Felipe Calderon of the right-wing National Action Party (PAN) was declared el presidente by a very slim margin, neither resolving the conflict nor dampening charges of electoral fraud.

What makes this crisis so dangerous now (for the Mexican ruling class) is that it occurs at a time when many diverse social movements are unifying their resistance & becoming more combative. A primary factor in this has been the Zapatista Indigenous insurgency in the southern state of Chiapas, which began in 1994 and which has had profound effects on Mexican society. The most recent manifestations of this have occurred in large-scale revolts in Atenco & Oaxaca in 2006, involving tens of thousands in protests & street-fighting.

Indigenous Mexico

The total population of Mexico is approximately 100 million. Of this, 12 million are estimated to be Indigenous (or 12 percent of the population). Others estimate the Indigenous population to be as high as 30 percent, with many being assimilated into the broader Mexican culture. The majority of the Mexican population are referred to as Mestizo, or mixed ethnicity of Indigenous & Spanish, who culturally identify as Mexican (although by our understanding, Mexico appears to be 90 % Indigenous, even if many are assimilated into the nation-state of Mexico). A small percent of the entire population is considered white, primarily descendants of the Spanish.

There are some 62 different Indigenous nations in Mexico, although the most well known are the Mexica (or Aztec) & Maya. The diversity in the landscape of Mexico is said to contribute to the many different Indigenous nations in the region. This land is comprised of mountainous regions & plateaus that cover more than 2/3 of the country, with the rest comprised of fertile valleys, forests and deserts.

The Zapatista Insurgency

On January 1, 1994, the EZLN emerged to capture 7 towns & cities across Chiapas, fighting with police & soldiers before withdrawing. Following this, the rebels did not carry out any new offensives, but instead focused on the base of their insurgency: their people. The EZLN have assisted Indigenous communities in Chiapas to build autonomous governing councils, schools, clinics, communications, & economic self-reliance. As a result, and due to the frequent public gatherings, mobilizations & campaigns carried out by the EZLN over the past 13 years, the Zapatista movement appears to have grown & strengthened (a claim of the EZLN in its Sixth Declaration, made in 2005). In fact, the insurgent spirit of the Zapatistas itself appears to have spread across many regions in Mexico (as well as internationally), a process that continues to this day.

The impact of the Zapatista rebellion has been felt throughout Mexico & contributed to significant political change. In 1994-95, the ruling PRI party (Institutional Revolutionary Party) was hit with the assassination of its primary presidential candidate & the exposure of major corruption within the party. In 1997, the PRI lost its majority control of the Congress for the first time in its history. In July 2000, the PRI was defeated in presidential elections, ending 7 decades of ‘democratic’ dictatorship.

Along with inspiring & mobilizing Indigenous peoples across Mexico, the Zapatistas have also served as a guiding light against neo-liberal economic policies that have hit many different social sectors throughout the country, including Indigenous campesinos, students, workers, & women. Some of the most important social conflicts that have occurred include the 1999 UNAM student strike, the 2006 rebellions in Atenco & Oaxaca, as well as the development of numerous guerrilla groups in the states of Chiapas, Guerrero & Oaxaca.

Atenco, 2006

Atenco is located near Mexico City and was the sight of conflict several years ago, in 1999-2002, when many residents fought to stop the construction of a new airport. The struggle at Atenco became a popular symbol of resistance throughout Mexico. In May 2006, Atenco once again became the scene of barricades & riots as heavy police repression was unleashed against the population. This recent conflict began on May 3, 2006, when police attempted to evict street vendors in the nearby town of Texcoco (20 miles east of Mexico City) from land where a proposed Wal-Mart is to be built.

In Atenco, the People’s Front in Defense of the Land, first formed to fight the airport project, blocked the highway in solidarity. Hundreds of riot police were sent in to remove the blockade, but despite 5 attempts to clear it they were repelled by the people fighting back with batons, rocks, & Molotovs. This violence resulted in many people injured, one youth shot & killed, & scores of arrests. The people also took 11 police hostage, although most were later released.

The next day, at 6:30 AM, over three thousand police (mostly the Federal Preventative Police, PFP) invaded Atenco, violently dispersing barricades & crowds with batons, tear gas, & plastic bullets. Hundreds of people were injured, and after a few hours police gained control of the streets. They then began house-to-house raids, breaking doors & windows, attacking people and carrying out arrests, especially of movement organizers.

In the aftermath of these attacks, over 100 had been arrested, with nearly 200 more missing. At least 3 persons were killed. In addition, many women who had been arrested were sexually assaulted by police. By early evening, most of the police had withdrawn from Atenco, leaving a trail of terror & destruction in their wake. Many observers see the police repression at Atenco as being closely related to the struggle over the airport, which is seen as a project still sought after by business & government.

Oaxaca, 2006

Oaxaca is a state neighboring Chiapas. It is an estimated 60 percent Indigenous, with a population of some 3.2 million overall. Oaxaca city is the state capital and a main tourist destination. The conflict in Oaxaca city arose as a result of a teacher’s strike that began on May 22, and which was joined by Indigenous & other people’s organizations. They presented a number of demands, including better health, education, infrastructure, wages, etc., to the state government. The movement soon converged around efforts to have the governor—Ulises Ruiz Ortiz—removed from office. Ortiz was widely despised due to his coming to power in 2004 under a cloud of fraud & corruption, and because of his repressive polices once in office.

On June 2, during federal elections and then one week later, on June 7, mass demonstrations of from 100-200,000 occurred in Oaxaca. Then, on June 14, Ortiz ordered the violent dispersal of a protest camp in the Zocalo (city center). Many people were injured by batons & tear gas, and pregnant women had miscarriages as a result. Later that day, thousands of people descended on the Zocalo & re-established the picket. A week later, the Popular Assembly of the People of Oaxaca (APPO) was established to coordinate the resistance movement.

The APPO, comprised of teachers, peasants, Indigenous, women’s, workers, and many other groups, then organized more mass rallies involving as many as 1 million people. Radio & TV stations were taken over & government offices occupied. Against this, the government repeatedly used its police & paramilitary forces to attack the movement.

On November 26, heavy fighting again broke out when a large force of police invaded the city to clear out the resistance. Many buildings & cars were set on fire, along with attacks on police who used water cannons, tear gas, baton charges, arrests, torture, rape, and assassination.

According to the National Human Rights Commission (the CNDH, & reported in La Jornada), since August 2006, some 20 people have been assassinated (many of whom were movement organizers), over 350 have been arrested, nearly 400 injured, with more disappeared. Along with raids on homes & offices has been the practise of street abductions carried out by armed & masked men (police), who then torture their prisoners for information before releasing them.

Guerrillas in their Midst

Mexico has a long history of guerrilla warfare, dating back to the time of the Spanish invasion (early 1500s), through to the 1800s independence struggle, to invasion & annexation by the US (1848), to the 1910-19 Revolution. During the 1960s & ‘70s, a number of armed groups appeared throughout Mexico, most notably in the states of Guerrerro & Oaxaca, including the Party of the Poor (led by Lucio Cabanas, a former teacher) & the Revolutionary Clandestine Workers’ Union Party (PROCUP). Although largely destroyed by Mexican military & police action by the late 1970s, this phase of guerrilla activity would contribute to the development of later struggles.

According to their history, the origins of the EZLN can be traced back to this period, when a few surviving guerrillas made their way to the mountains of Chiapas, where they began to meet Indigenous fighters & peasants. By the early 1980s, the basis of the Zapatista army had been formed, and thereafter began ten years of organizing, recruiting, training, and gathering of resources.

Following the 1994 Zapatista uprising, there has been a proliferation of new guerrilla groups in Mexico. In 1995, the Clandestine Armed Forces (FAC) announced its formation, along with the Liberation Army of the Southern Sierra (ELSS), both in Guerrero. In Oaxaca, the Clandestine Indigenous National Liberation Army emerged, claiming to operate in both the mountains & urban areas. While these & many other examples have remained apparently small, unknown, and not very active groups, a new guerrilla movement appeared in Guerrero in 1996 that was far more organized: the Popular Liberation Army (EPR).

The EPR emerged in June 1996, during commemorations for 17 campesino activists murdered one year earlier by state police at Aguas Blancas. Over the course of the next few months, the EPR engaged in several gun battles—including raids & ambushes-- with police & soldiers. In August, the group carried out coordinated attacks in Oaxaca, Guerrero, Puebla, Tabasco, Guanajuato, and Mexico City, against police & government targets. The EPR claimed to have killed 41 government officials & police during these attacks. Their units operated in groups numbering up to 130 (company strength). EPR activity continued into 1997, even as it faced growing repression from the Mexican army & police.

During this same time, other guerrilla groups appeared, including the Guanajuato Revolutionary Army, the Revolutionary Army for Popular Insurrection (ERPI, an offshoot of the ERP), and the Armed Front for the Liberation of Marginalized People of Guerrero (FALPMG). In 2000, the Revolutionary Armed Forces of the People (FARP) appeared. Today, there are an estimated two dozen or more guerrilla groups in Mexico, with as many as 20 additional groups in Mexico City.

The primary areas for the proliferation of guerrilla activities have been the southern states of Chiapas, Guerrero & Oaxaca. These three states also have some of the highest ratios of Indigenous peoples and suffer the highest rates of poverty, unemployment, poor health, lack of infrastructure, etc. They also contain mountainous regions that provide better conditions for the establishment of guerrillas & base camps.

Context of Oppression & Resistance

Despite 13 years of neo-liberal economic policies following the implementation of NAFTA in 1994, most Mexicans continue to live in poverty, with as many as 70 million living at or below the poverty line. Along with rising costs of living, the government has also privatized many government & social services (an example of neo-liberalism). The effect has been to increase levels of poverty, even while the rich & middle-class have prospered.

In the northern border regions, rampant crime & violence associated with the drug trade has, in turn, been linked to government, police & military officials. Throughout the country, political corruption, poverty, & oppression has led many to become disillusioned & cynical towards the government, its courts & police, and the entire political establishment. The failure of the government to honour the San Andres Accords of 1996, which would have included Indigenous rights in the Constitution, along with ongoing electoral fraud, has led many to the conclusion that the avenues of legal & political change are closed.

At the same time, the Mexican military & police have carried out a ‘dirty war’ using torture, false arrests, disappearances and assassinations against members of the resistance. There are an estimated 500 political prisoners in Mexico today. The military & police have also received vast amounts of economic, technical & material aid from the US (under the pretext of a ‘War on Drugs’). In addition, paramilitary groups comprised of ranchers, landowners, police & military personnel are active in many states & have been responsible for numerous massacres, assassinations, disappearances, & assaults. Despite its image of ‘democracy’, the Mexican government clearly uses terror & violence to counter political opposition & to repress social movements.

Mexico is today the United State’s second largest trading partner. It is a primary exporter of manufactured goods & energy to the US. The state-owned PEMEX oil company is the world’s fifth largest, and 80 % of Mexico’s oil production goes to the US. Along with being a source of cheap manufactured goods & energy, Mexico is also an important source of agricultural products & illegal drugs to the US. Due to its geographic location, it is a primary transit route for export from Central & S. America (an important part of the proposed Free Trade Area of the Americas, FTAA, which includes new highways, airports & port facilities).

For these reasons, Mexico is of vital strategic interest to the US. In 1917,during the Mexican Revolution, the US stationed 35,000 troops along the border to prevent refugees—along with revolution—from spreading into the country. Today, mass illegal immigration by Mexicans has swelled their population inside the US by an estimated 12 million. Along with legalized Mexican immigrants & their descendants, this population is now a powerful political force within the US (‘Latinos’ & ‘Hispanics’, primarily from Mexico, Central & South America, now comprise an estimated 40 million people, or some 20 % of the entire US population). In May 2006, huge rallies against proposed changes to immigration laws drew millions of Mexican-Americans and included widespread high-school walkouts & strikes by Mexican immigrants, who are an important source of cheap, physical labour in farms & factories throughout the country. For these same reasons, Mexico is also of vital strategic interest to resistance movements in both the US & Canada, as well as internationally.

Originally published in Warrior, No. 3, Summer 2007

Zapatista Encounter, January 2007

First Encounter of the Zapatista Communities with the Peoples of the World, January 2007

The 13th Anniversary of the 1994 Zapatista New Year’s Day Rebellion

From December 30, 2006, to January 2, 2007, several thousand Zapatistas and international delegates gathered in the town of Oventik, located near San Cristobal in Chiapas, Mexico, to mark the 13th anniversary of the 1994 Zapatista New Year’s Day Rebellion. It was also the First Encounter of the Zapatista Communities with the Peoples of the World (although there have been many other gatherings, or encuentros, over the years).

Background: Who are the Zapatistas?

For those who do not know, the Zapatistas are an Indigenous insurgent movement based in Chiapas, the southernmost state in Mexico (Emiliano Zapata was an Indigenous peasant who became a leader in the 1910-19 Mexican Revolution). They are comprised mostly of Tzotzil, Tzeltal, Chol & Tojolabal peoples, the descendants of the Maya.

Despite being a major source of natural minerals, oil, timber, cattle ranching, hydro-electric projects, coffee, textiles, as well as a tourist destination for the Mexican economy, Chiapas is also the most impoverished region in the country. The large Indigenous population (over 30 % of the population) suffers from high levels of poverty, malnutrition, sickness & disease, even while vast amounts of natural resources are plundered from their traditional territories every day.

It has been this way for centuries, ever since the Spanish invasion & occupation back in the early 1500s. At the same time, so too has the people’s resistance to colonization continued, with many rebellions as well as the day-to-day forms of struggle against government officials, ranchers, land-owners, bosses, & priests—most of whom have been white-skinned & non-Indigenous.

On New Year’s Day, 1994, the most recent rebellion began when armed warriors from the Zapatista Army of National Liberation (EZLN in its Spanish acronym) emerged from the jungle and briefly took control of 7 cities & towns across the state, including Ocosingo & San Cristobal (cities with populations of 100,000 & 80,000 respectively). While gun battles occurred with police & military forces, this first offensive was low in casualties but had a major impact on Mexico. In the days following, the Mexican Army’s counter-attack left hundreds dead, with some 15,000 troops deployed and fighter planes carrying out bombing runs.

The timing of the EZLN’s attack was coordinated with the implementation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and the Zapatistas were among the first to articulate a clear analysis and critique of capitalist globalization and its plan of neo-liberalism (literally, a ‘new freedom’ for transnational corporations to exploit people, land & resources without limits imposed by national governments). NAFTA also represented a major threat to Indigenous peasants in the region, particularly its requirement that Article 27 of the Mexican Constitution be removed thereby breaking up collective land rights held by Indigenous & peasant communities.

Although the Zapatista soldiers withdrew back into the jungles, they did not simply appear out of nowhere, nor did they disappear. Later revealed in press interviews, the Zapatistas had begun organizing & training ten years prior, in 1984. They had done this in secret, spreading their insurgent views, recruiting members, gathering resources, and expanding their organization.
Unlike many other insurgent movements in Mexico & Central America that operated in primarily Indigenous regions during the 1960s-80s, the Zapatistas were almost entirely Indigenous as was their leadership (primarily the Clandestine Indigenous Resistance Coordinating Committee- CCRI). Although they had organized an army, the Zapatistas were also firmly based within the Indigenous communities of Chiapas (unlike many other previous guerrilla groups active in Mexico & Central America during the 1970s-80s). Also, unlike many others, the EZLN did not seek to seize state power and to impose a communist regime.

In an oppressive patriarchal society such as Mexico, largely the result of the Catholic Church’s role in colonization, and where machismo is held up as a role model, the EZLN ensured that Indigenous women were promoted & accepted as genuine members of society & the movement, and not as second-class citizens. A Revolutionary Women’s Law was part of the EZLN’s initial statements, and many women not only underwent military training but also attained positions of command & leadership.

In February 1994, the EZLN entered into negotiations with the Mexican federal government, achieved a cease-fire, and began debate over the development of Constitutional rights for Indigenous peoples (eventually signing the 1996 San Andres Accords, which were never fully implemented). In 1997, a massacre by paramilitaries killed 45 people in the Chiapas town of Acteal. In 1999, the EZLN launched the Consulta (Consultation), a broad campaign across Mexico to solicit direction & gain support for the Zapatista movement. In 2001, the Zapatistas organized the March for Indigenous Dignity, which drew support from millions of Mexicans, as part of its efforts to pressure the Mexican Congress to include Indigenous rights in the Constitution. The Zapatistas also organized several national & international gatherings in Chiapas over the years.

Although an armed force of several thousand fighters, the EZLN have maintained a defensive posture since 1994, carrying out no new offensives but engaging government forces in numerous defensive battles. Instead, the main focus of their efforts has been the Indigenous communities in Chiapas (a true insurgent movement):
“We, the Zapatistas of the EZLN, have devoted this time to our primary force, to the people who support us”
(The Other Campaign, p. 85).

Over the years, the EZLN has assisted many Indigenous communities in Chiapas in self-organization & achieving self-reliance. This has included establishing autonomous governance councils in many villages, towns and municipalities (autonomous because they are separate from the Mexican government system). A common slogan has been to “govern by obeying.” Along with this has been the building of health clinics, schools, and collectives (i.e., weaving & sewing co-ops, coffee growers, etc.)—all without government support or funding. The leadership of the autonomous governments, health clinics & schools are rotated every 10 days or so, ensuring that corruption is minimized and that all learn how to participate in community self-organization. Overall, the Zapatistas have made significant steps towards achieving autonomy, self-reliance & self-determination, an inspiring model for Indigenous peoples in North America. According to a 2005 EZLN declaration:

“If you look at one of the government-sponsored studies, you will see the only Indigenous communities that have improved their living conditions—whether in health, education, food or housing—were those in Zapatista territory… “
(The Other Campaign, p. 85).

2005 La Otra Campana/The Other Campaign

After the 1994 uprising, the EZLN entered into negotiations with the government as well as the left-wing PRD (Democratic Revolutionary Party, the main opposition party). Above all, they sought inclusion & recognition of Indigenous rights in the Mexican Constitution & political system. Following the 2001 refusal by the state—including the PRD-- to implement these reforms, the Zapatistas saw little hope in working with the official political parties.

In June 2005, the Zapatistas released their Sixth Declaration from the Lacandon Jungle and launched the Other Campaign shortly after, a national effort to unify social resistance movements across the country and create new networks & models of self-determination. It calls for the unity & solidarity of all extra-parliamentary movements & organizations (i.e., those outside of the political parties), and in particular the anti-capitalist Left. It was timed to coincide with the 2006 presidential election campaigns leading up to the July 2 vote, although its vision & organizing extends far beyond this date. The declaration itself is a history & analysis of the EZLN, the Zapatistas, and current conditions in Mexico, that has received widespread interest & support across the country. The 6th Declaration and the Other Campaign appear to be the main guiding philosophy & strategy of the Zapatistas at this time.

The 2006-07 Gathering in Oventik

Oventik is one of the stronger Zapatista rebel communities and has been the site of numerous international gatherings. It is located about 1 hours drive from San Cristobal and is in rugged, mountainous terrain that is colder & wetter than the low-land regions. At times, Oventik was shrouded in a heavy fog that made everything seem dream-like & surreal. It also rained several times, turning the ground into patches of slick mud.

Traveling from Mexico City to San Cristobal, and then to Oventik, we had expected to cross numerous military checkpoints, to be questioned & searched, etc. Instead, we did not pass one, nor was there any visible military presence in the area during the gathering. Traveling the highway, however, you cross many toll booths, at which there are usually soldiers posted.

Inside Oventik, several thousand people gathered for 4 days to attend workshops, listen to speeches, observe cultural performances, and celebrate the 13 anniversary of the uprising. Most of those attending were local Indigenous people & Zapatistas, people from across Mexico, groups of European radicals, and our delegation of Indigenous people from BC (including Native Youth Movement members, a Redwire staff member, WARRIOR Publications, and Secwepemc elder Wolverine). Many of the Zapatistas wore their ski masks, so there were usually hundreds of masked warriors in camp.

Although the gathering was promoted as an encounter with the ‘peoples of the world’, the main representation from outside Mexico appeared to be white European radicals from N. America & W. Europe. I didn’t see any Africans, and just a few Asians. It seems that beyond Mexico, the primary support networks that have been established have been with white radicals. This, in turn, appears to be the result of the politics of the EZLN as well as the economic capacity of white radicals to not only travel to Chiapas, but to also provide financial, technical & material support to the Zapatistas. Nor was there any significant representation from Indigenous peoples in Canada or the US (aside from us).

There were only 7 main workshops: Autonomy & Governance, Education, Health, Women, Communications, Commerce, and the Struggle for Land & Territory. They were almost all conducted by Zapatistas and comprised largely of reports from different towns & regions. They talked about the type of work they have accomplished and how they did it. After, there was time for questions & statements from others. There was no translation, but we had our own comrades to translate for us.

One of the main points I noticed was the Zapatista emphasis on training people to gain skills & experience, which they in turn pass on to others. For example, when they began establishing health clinics & schools, they sent people out for training and then began the process again within their communities. Because many of those who do the work do not get paid, communities support them by providing transportation, food, shelter, etc.

Oventik itself is a model of much of the work the Zapatistas have sought to carry out. In the market area, where the gathering was held, there is a main street running down to a large stage & open area. Along the street are small houses & shacks, many of which are co-operatives selling food, coffee, clothing, boots, literature & DVD’s, etc. During the gathering, these co-ops were the main source of food for those attending the gathering, as there were no community dinners or kitchens. The gathering itself put thousands of dollars into the local economy (clever capitalists those anti-capitalists). Along with a school and health clinic, there is also a pirate radio station, Radio Insurgente, that broadcasts to local communities. The Good Governance Council also has a building on this street. Most of the buildings had murals painted on them, part of a rich & vibrant culture of resistance among the people.

On the night of January 31, a large celebration was held in the main stage area. Many speeches & performances occurred, along with statements from several EZLN commanders, including Subcomandante Marcos, Comandanta/es Yoland, Hortensia, David, & Lt.-Col. Moises. Whenever the commanders appeared, there was a large security force around him or her, clearing a path through the crowd and ensuring no one got too close. Later every night until 3 in the morning there was dancing (a traditional Mexican-Spanish folk dance of some kind). Despite the heavy discussions during the day, there was always a festive atmosphere.

Conclusion

Overall, the gathering was very inspiring & educational. I was able to see the strength & determination of the Zapatistas with my own eyes (which you can see in theirs). I was also able to witness their efforts to achieve autonomy & self-determination within their communities & territories. The Zapatistas are well organized, trained, disciplined, humble & respectful. They are a true Indigenous resistance warrior movement, and one that Indigenous people in North America can learn a great deal from. In October, 2007, the National Indigenous Congress, along with the Zapatistas, will be hosting an Indigenous gathering in northern Mexico. It will be the 515 year mark since the European invasion of the Americas in 1492, and a good opportunity for Indigenous peoples from north & south to meet.

To better understand the history & philosophy of the Zapatistas, it is recommended that you read the Sixth Declaration from the Lacandon Jungle (The Other Campaign), which is now widely available on the Internet, and check out the following resources.

Resources & Info

Websites
www.narconews.com
www.zmag.org/chiapas1/index.htm
www.chiapas.indymedia.org
www.ezln.org.mx (in Spanish, good graphics)

Books
The Other Campaign, by Subcomandante Marcos & the Zapatistas, City Lights Books, San Francisco 2006

Our Word is our Weapon; Selected Writings of Subcomandante Insurgente Marcos, edited by Juana Ponce de Leon, Seven Stories Press, New York 2001

Homage to Chiapas; The New Indigenous Struggles in Mexico, by Bill Weinberg, Verso, New York 2000

Rebellion from the Roots; Indian Uprising in Chiapas, by John Ross, Common Courage Press, Maine 1995

Films
A Place Called Chiapas, 1998, Dir. by Nettie Wild, National Film Board of Canada (NFB), 92 min.

Zapatista, 2001, A Big Noise Film, documents period 1994-98, interviews with Marcos, Tache, & Ana Maria, Noam Chomsky, music by Rage Against the Machine & others.

Zapatista Women, 1995, 30 min., Spanish with English su

Native Warriors claim responsibility for taking Olympic flag


COMMUNIQUE

NATIVE WARRIOR SOCIETY

Native Warriors claim responsibility for taking Olympic flag

March 7, 2007

Coast Salish Territory [Vancouver, Canada]

In the early morning hours of Tuesday, March 6, 2007, we removed the Olympic
flag from its flag-pole at Vancouver City Hall. We pried open the access
panel on the pole with a crowbar and, using a bolt-cutter, cut the metal
cable/halyard inside, causing the flag to fall to the ground.

We claim this action in honor of Harriet Nahanee, our elder-warrior, who
was given a death sentence by the BC courts for her courageous stand in
defending Mother Earth.

We stand in solidarity with all those fighting against the destruction
caused by the 2010 Winter Olympic Games.

No Olympics on Stolen Native Land!

Native Warrior Society



Masked trio claims to have flag
Vancouver Sun, March 9, 2007

By Darah Hansen

Three masked men, all members of a group calling itself the Native Warrior
Society, have claimed responsibility for stealing the City of Vancouver's
Olympic flag. The flag disappeared early Tuesday morning from outside city
hall.

On Thursday afternoon, Vancouver police received a photo and letter signed
by the Native Warrior Society. The letter states the flag was stolen to
honour Harriet Nahanee, a Squamish Nation elder who died Feb. 24 of
previously undiagnosed lung cancer after serving nine days in a provincial
jail for breaching an injunction that prohibited protesters from interfering
with a Sea to Sky Highway route through Eagleridge Bluffs in West Vancouver.

The letter details how thieves used a crowbar to pry open the access panel
on the flagpole and bolt cutters to slice through the metal cable used to
hoist the flag. The attached photo shows three masked men standing, fists
raised, in front of what appears to be the stolen flag.

"We stand in solidarity with all those fighting the destruction caused by
the 2010 Winter Olympic Games. No Olympics on stolen native land!"

Vancouver police Const. Tim Fanning said police are working to determine
whether the flag in the photo is real or a digitally altered image. Fanning
said police are aware of the Native Warrior Society, but he could provide no
information Thursday evening as to its members or what they represent.

Meanwhile, Rene Fasel, who chairs the IOC Vancouver coordination
commission, dismissed any IOC concern over the theft of the flag, saying
people have a right to protest.

"Canada is a free country. You cannot expect 100 per cent of people
supporting the Olympics,"h e said. "For sure, stealing a flag is not legal,
and we are sad and disappointed that it happened. It is a lack of respect."

Tewanee Joseph, executive director and CEO of the Four Host First Nations,
a group working with Vancouver 2010 organizers on behalf of the Lil'wat,
Musqueam, Squamish and Tsleil-Waututh, first nations, noted "There are many
views and there are many challenges."

Why We Need Warrior Society's

Mandan Warrior Mato Tope

What is a Warrior Society?
A warrior society is a group organized to defend their people, territory & way of life.

Functions

Traditionally, most warrior society’s carried out 3 main functions: military, police & social. Their military function involved armed defense of people & territory. Their police function involved punishing anti-social crimes, & overall security of the village. Their social function involved feasts, camaraderie, and ceremonies. Many warrior society’s were also secret and/or ceremonial society’s.

Resistance Movement

As colonization does not rely solely on military action, but involves political, economic, psychological, & cultural aspects, we must apply this same thinking to decolonization.

Decolonization is not a legal struggle, nor is it purely military, or economic, etc. It involves all of these. It should be noted, however, that colonialism was imposed through military force. Ultimately, it is the system’s monopoly on the use of violence that enables it to impose its will.

Considering this, it can be seen that the activities of modern warrior society’s must involve much more than military training in order for their defensive roles to be realized. That is why it is said that modern warriors must be communicators, organizers, and leaders, able to inform & inspire others, and mobilize them into the resistance movement.

Military training, however, is an essential part of a warrior society. This is because the defensive role of the warrior will always include the potential for armed conflict against an enemy force (one of the greatest dangers to any nation).

At the same time, under present conditions, these aspects of the warrior society are not used often, and even then are mostly defensive actions. As defense is for times of insufficiency, the primary military function of a warrior society at this time is for self-defense.

Warrior Training

Military training helps instill values such as confidence, self-discipline, teamwork, etc. Warrior training also involves traditional culture, including ceremonies and field-craft. Ceremonies help instill similar values as military training (including patience & endurance), while reconnecting one to the spiritual world and their culture. Field-craft (i.e., hunting, gathering wild foods, making tools & shelter, etc.) also reinforces traditional culture and will become vital to the survival of future generations.

The Positive Aspects of Warrior Society’s

When Native military resistance was defeated (by 1890 in N. America), along with colonization came the disbanding of warrior society’s. Confined to reservations, warriors were condemned to a life without purpose. Many turned to alcohol out of despair & hopelessness.

Along with trauma experienced in Residential Schools & loss of identity, today’s generations continue to live lives with little apparent meaning or purpose. The result is widespread drug & alcohol abuse, high suicide rates, imprisonment, etc. This is compounded by feelings of insecurity, low self-esteem, poverty, etc.

A warrior society can help stop these negative trends by instilling in youth traditional values, a sense of purpose, and meaningful, challenging activities that also serve the common good. This is in part what made warrior society’s such an important part of traditional Indigenous society.

Casualties & Attrition

Many fear the potential consequences of organizing warrior society’s, which can include state violence & repression. We must remember, however, that colonization is by its nature violent. It is a society sustained through violence, here & abroad.

While many fear potential casualties from combat, real casualties are occurring now in the streets & reservations, through suicides, drugs & alcohol, prison, disease, interpersonal violence, etc. Many Native youth are now being recruited into gangs, who engage in anti-social criminal activity among their own people. Through drugs, prostitution, theft & assaults, gangs lead to division & demoralization among our people.

As well, every summer, hundreds of Native youth from across Canada undergo military training—as either cadets or in Canadian Forces Aboriginal-specific training courses (i.e., Bold Eagle & Raven)-- where platoons of Natives are given training in firearms, field-craft, drill, military law, map & compass, etc.

In addition, we must remember that in Asia, Africa and South America, people are routinely killed, tortured & massacred to maintain the global system.
We can see, therefore, that violence & casualties are occurring now as a result of colonial oppression. It is this oppression the warrior society is meant to defend against. In fact, the very formation of a warrior society can help give purpose & direction to misguided youth, for whom institutional means have thus far failed (including schools, jails, jobs, etc.).

Fear and Propaganda

Perhaps the greatest obstacle to organizing warrior society’s among our people is fear. This fear is maintained through the corporate media & entertainment industries, which reinforces people’s belief that the government is their protector, & which portrays the system as all-powerful.

This fear is compounded by enemy propaganda (primarily through corporate media), which portrays warriors as criminals, thugs or terrorists.

In order to counter this, warrior culture & fighting spirit must be strengthened among our people. Most importantly, warriors must conduct themselves in such a way that they inspire hope & confidence among our people.

LONG LIVE THE WARRIOR!!!

Originally published in Warrior No. 1, Spring-Summer 2006

Oka Crisis, 1990

Kanienkehaka [Mohawk] Resistance at Oka/Kanehsatake & Kahnawake, 1990 by Zulu

The Kanienkehaka resistance at Kanehsatake & Kahnawake had a profound impact on Indigenous peoples in Canada. Oka set the tone for Indigenous resistance throughout the ‘90s, and inspired many people & communities to take action. Like Wounded Knee 1973, Oka was an awakening for an entire generation.

INTRODUCTION

The Oka Crisis of 1990 involved the Mohawk territories of Kanehsatake/Oka & Kahnawake, both located near Montreal, Quebec. The standoff began with an armed police assault on a blockade at Kanehsatake on July 11, 1990, which saw one police officer shot dead in a brief exchange of gunfire. Following this, 2,000 police were mobilized, later replaced by 4,500 soldiers with tanks & APC’s, along with naval & air support.

All through the summer of 1990, Oka was the top story in Canadian TV & print media. The armed warriors at both Kanehsatake & Kahnawake inspired widespread support & solidarity from Indigenous people throughout the country. Protests, occupations, blockades, & sabotage actions were carried out, an indication of the great potential for rebellion amongst Indigenous peoples.

This manifestation of unity & solidarity served to limit the use of lethal force by the government in ending the standoff. Overall, Oka had a profound effect on Indigenous peoples and was the single most important factor in re-inspiring our warrior spirit. The 77-day standoff also served as an example of Indigenous sovereignty, and the necessity of armed force to defend territory & people against violent aggression by external forces.

Background Information

Mohawks refer to themselves as Kanienkehaka (people of the flint). They are one nation of the Haudenosaunee (people of the longhouse, also the Six Nations Iroquois Confederacy). The other nations in this confederacy are: Oneida, Onondaga, Seneca, Cayuga, and Tuscarora. Combined, the Iroquois have a population of between 75-100,000 in both Canada & the US. The territories discussed are all Mohawk.

Kanehsatake is located 53 km west of Montreal, Quebec. Its territory is divided into several sections and next to the town of Oka. The population of Kanehsatake is approx. 1400.

Kahnawake, on the other hand, is just 15 km west of Montreal on the shores of the St. Lawrence river, and has a pop. of 7000.

Akwesasne is located 75 km west of Montreal, near Cornwall, Ontario, and along the St. Lawrence river. It is divided between Ontario, Quebec, & New York. It has a population of 12,000.

For centuries, the Haudenosaunee have resisted European colonization. They were (and are) a large & powerful force in the eastern woodlands region of N. America. During the 1600s & 1700s, they sided with the British against first the French, and then the Americans. When the Indian Act band council system was imposed, many Haudenosaunee communities rejected it. By the 1920s, RCMP invaded the last holdouts at Six Nations & Akwesasne to force compliance.

In the 1960s, Mohawks became involved in protests & occupations. In 1968, Mohawk protesters blocked traffic on the Seaway International Bridge at Akwesasne to demand recognition of the Jay Treaty. A Mohawk—Richard Oaks—was a prominent spokesperson during the occupation of Alcatraz Island near San Francisco, in 1969.

In Kahnawake, a singing society was formed to learn traditional songs. This would form the basis for the Warrior Society. In 1970, Mohawks from Kahnawake re-occupied 2 islands in the St. Lawrence river. The next year, Kahnawake Mohawks assisted Onondagas in stopping a construction project in New York.

In 1973, warriors evicted all non-native residents from Kahnawake. This led to a large invasion by SQ, and a week long standoff. The warriors get greater support from the traditionalist Longhouse, and decide to expand their horizons.

In 1974, Kahnawake Mohawks and others re-occupy Ganienkeh, in New York state. It is an abandoned summer camp on land claimed by New York. After confrontations with local Americans & state police, negotiations lead to a settlement. The land is exchanged for another parcel, closer to the Canadian border & the communities of Akwesasne & Kahnawake (in 1977). Louis Karoniakatajeh Hall is a main spokesperson for Ganienkeh, and creates the Unity flag, also referred to as the Mohawk Warrior flag.

In 1978, the Kahnawake Survival School was established, with Mohawks teaching Mohawk language, culture, & history.

In 1979, there is a brief standoff between warriors & state police at Akwesasne (Raquette Point). That same year, Donald Cross is shot by police in Kahnawake.

In 1981, SQ violence against Mi’kmaqs at Restigouche further alarms Kahnawake Mohawks. Various factions cooperate in drafting a confidential defense plan for the territory.

Throughout the 1980s, there is increased factional fighting over gambling & casinos at Akwesasne, which have become multi-million dollar operations. In the late ‘80s, police begin raiding casinos in Akwesasne, confiscating slot machines & seizing business records. They claimed the casinos were evading taxes & were illegal. Some Mohawks began to oppose the casinos, accusing them of corruption & anti-social effects.

In Dec 1987, over 200 police carried out raids on six casinos in Akwesasne, taking slot machines.

At Kahnawake, another form of ‘shady’ business has evolved: cheap cigarettes, allegedly the result of smuggling. By the late ‘80s, dozens of small shacks lined the roads.

On June 1, 1988, over 200 RCMP, with heavily-armed Emergency Response Teams, riot cops, etc., invade Kahnawake and raid the tobacco shops. In response, warriors seized the Mercier Bridge & blocked highways.

In July 1989, over 400 FBI & state police invade Akwesasne and are at first stopped by warrior blockades. The police re-position themselves, and are able to raid several casinos. At this time, the warriors were carrying out regular patrols to detect & deter police from invading their territory. Some anti-gambling factions were also pro-police.

On March 30, 1990, a Vermont National Guard helicopter is allegedly shot at while flying over Ganienkeh and is forced to land nearby. FBI & NY state police threaten to enter the territory and there is a standoff for several days.

At the same time, disputes between pro-gambling & anti-gambling factions escalated at Akwesasne. Assaults, fire-bombings and shootings began to occur. On May 1/90, two Mohawks were shot dead, and hundreds of police moved in to occupy the territory.

In Kahnawake, there’s not the same problems and a bit more unity; some profits from the cigarette trade are used to fund the Longhouse & Warrior Society. The warriors are also employed to act as security. Despite the conflict at Akwesasne (or maybe becuz of it), warriors from Akwesasne continued to assist Mohawks at Kanehsatake throughout the spring of 1990.


....to continue click here